Letter: Zero for timing
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: While agreeing with Alan Clark's rejoinder to your Spitfire article (8, 11 May) may I point out that even he doesn't get all the facts right? The Japanese Zero indeed had no American prototype, but it was also not "developed from Russian La-5s captured in Manchuria" after they gave the Japanese a "bad time" in the Khalkin Gol border war. Khalkin Gol took place over the summer of 1939, a few months after the Zero's first flight, and the La-5 first flew in early 1942, some three years later.
Semyon Lavochkin's La-5, like the Spitfire and the Zero, is an example of national "style" - in this case frantic and inspired improvisation - but that is another story.
Evan Mawdsley
Department of Modern History
University of Glasgow
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments