Letter: Wrong about animal rights
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.YOUR leading article (6 December) made some good points, but I take issue with its assumption that animal liberationists must necessarily love animals.
Nobody assumes that people working for improvements for mistreated racial minorities must be particularly attached to those races to bother to help them. We simply value these activists for caring about those unlike ourselves, and in a weaker position. Similarly animal rightists should be seen simply as people working for improvements in the conditions of animals: a moral issue. The first group is trying to overcome the results of racism, the second group speciesism (analogous with racism).
"Speciesism: the assumption that man is superior to all other species of animals and that he is therefore justified in exploiting them to his own advantage." (Chambers Dictionary, 1993)
HEATHER EVANS
Kenilworth, Warwickshire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments