Letter: Working towards real equality

Miss Kamlesh Bahl
Wednesday 24 November 1993 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Your leading article ('More help for working women', 22 November) picks up on points made in the report by the Institute of Fiscal Studies (part of a wider research project commissioned by the Equal Opportunities Commission).

Your leading article is welcome and timely in that it identifies issues of major public policy. Improving the status of part-time work, giving support to working parents, providing career development opportunities to all employees and raising the status of those who stay at home and care for children - the parents and workforce of the future.

The main message of the IFS study is that while the relative income of women has improved over the last 20 years, women on average still only have access to half the independent income of men. This is of considerable concern to the EOC. Women are still significantly over-represented among adults with little or no independent income and grossly under-represented among those in higher income groups.

While on current trends some improvements may be expected, the projected growth is in low paid, low status, part-time jobs, occupied predominantly by women. This seems unlikely to produce a significant narrowing of the gap in average earnings from employment or a rise in women's income from pensions and annuities (one- third of men's, according to the study).

It is misleading to refer to a 'significant stride ahead' in women's earnings power. Women continue to see the work that they do undervalued and part-timers in particular do not enjoy the same access to bonus and pay benefits as full-time workers.

The EOC does not measure progress to equality by reductions in the working conditions and employment levels of men. Indeed, the reductions in male employment already mean that men are facing discrimination when applying for part-time jobs in service industries.

It is important to recognise that people's so-called preferences for part-time work are often constrained by the actual choices available. The challenge for all of us is to ensure that genuine choice and genuine equality do not take a further 20 years to achieve.

Yours faithfully,

KAMLESH BAHL

Chairwoman

Equal Opportunities Commission

Manchester

23 November

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in