Letter: Workfare looks unworkable to the Kentish 'chain gang'

Martin Cock
Friday 27 September 1996 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Your report on workfare (26 September) highlights the fact that pilot studies on forcing the unemployed to work for their benefits are taking place in Hull and north Kent.

Evidence so far from the pilot areas suggests that the Tories will have much more trouble in implementing US-style workfare than they think. In both areas, the scheme - officially titled Project Work but dubbed "the Chain Gang" by many of its participants - is not only unfair, but also impossible to operate.

Hull City, Rochester City and Kent County councils have all boycotted any work connected with the scheme. The voluntary sector has also been unwilling to participate because the work is forced.

Some of the placements that have been found are in areas that were previously done by people on community service orders, placing both the jobs of probation- related staff and alternatives to custody at risk.

Ironically, one of the first organisations in Kent to take people on the scheme was a local Napoleonic fort, partly built by French prisoners of war.

If "Conservative strategists" are "hopeful that [the] pilots ... will highlight the positive aspects of the scheme", they are either being told fibs by civil servants on the ground or are deliberately ignoring the evidence from Kent and Hull. Workfare is unworkable.

MARTIN COCK

Vice-Chair, Medway Towns Trades Union Council

Rochester, Kent

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in