Letter: Workers risk fatal radiation exposure to keep their jobs
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The attitude of the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) over the death of William Neilson (9 May) is indefensible. If, as seems likely, he died as the result of exposure to x-irradiation at work, then it is bound to investigate and make recommendations for the conduct of such work in future. On the other hand, if Mr Neilson's work practices conformed to present standards, then it must investigate this also since, even if there is 'no evidence of breach of any regulation by anyone', the regulations were clearly not adequate to prevent him from losing his life.
The overriding consideration for occupational health practitioners is to protect those at work from its ill-effects, and deaths from occupationally related diseases should be seen as a national disgrace. We would have much more respect for the HSE - which is supposedly removed from party politics - if it would openly say that the reason it is not able adequately to protect people at work is because it does not have sufficient funds to monitor working conditions as it feels it should. Giving government departments advice on which health and safety regulations can be relaxed is surely not what it was brought into being to do.
Yours faithfully,
H. A. WALDRON
Consultant Physician
Department of Occupational
Health
St Mary's Hospital
London, W2
10 May
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments