Letter: Work and morals
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: While supporting the "big idea" of the present government that everybody should be given the opportunity to be employed rather than receive benefits, may I promote the balancing policy of a minimum income necessary for healthy living. This should also join the ranks of "big ideas".
The poorest 10 per cent in the United Kingdom are dying younger than they were. The reasons given have been stress and inadequate diet and health care. There has been no improvement in their life span since the 1920s. The rest of us are living longer.
There is a minimum income needed for a pregnant woman which will provide adequate nutrition for her and her unborn child. Failure to provide such an income in social benefits to the poorest families sets up a time bomb of physical and mental inadequacy which runs on through the generations.
Single parents, two-parent families, teenagers, pensioners and others need appropriate minimum incomes sufficient to ensure that nutrition is not diminished because of the needs for warmth, clothing, transport and other necessities.
Governments are, however, flying blind. They increase or reduce benefits and pensions, propose a minimum income, with no idea, big or little, of the weekly incomes needed for healthy living and an improved expectation of life for the poorest.
The Rev PAUL NICOLSON
Chairman
Zeccheaus 2000 Trust
Henley-on-Thames, Oxfordshire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments