Letter: Women's 'responsibility' for being attacked
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Contrary to some of your correspondents, I deplore the sentiments expressed by Angela Lambert (23 August). Angus Diggle deserves no sympathy. He has been prosecuted and convicted of a very serious crime. To suggest that his victim somehow brought the attack upon herself, by spending the evening with him and then offering him the simple courtesy of a bed for the night, is nonsense. If a man chooses to batter the woman with whom he lives, or tries to rape a woman sleeping in the same house, he is committing a serious criminal offence and must face the consequences.
The insidious myth that women 'ask for it' is the reason why women face such inordinate difficulty getting crimes of sexual assault, or domestic violence, treated seriously. I expect that in this case the Crown Prosecution Service felt impelled to prosecute because the victim was a lawyer and there were two witnesses. Had she been a woman in a council flat who invited a man back after an evening in the pub together, and there were no witnesses, the CPS would not have touched her case with a bargepole.
Another insidious myth, that women cry 'rape' after being disappointed by sex, underlies the offensive corroboration rule. This requires judges trying a case of sexual assault to tell the jury it is dangerous to convict on the uncorroborated evidence of the complainant. Recent research shows no convincing evidence that women make false allegations of rape (Lees & Gregory, Rape and Sexual Assault: a Study of Attrition, July 1993). Yet the need for independent, corroborative evidence of rape is the cause of many rapes going unprosecuted, and many trials resulting in acquittals.
Both the Law Commission and the Royal Commission on Criminal Justice have recommended the abolition of the corroboration rule. It is high time the Home Secretary acted.
Yours sincerely,
BARBARA HEWSON
Barrister
London, WC1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments