LETTER:Withdrawal of United Nations peace-keepers would lead to carnage in Bosnia
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr Randhir Singh Bains
Sir: The holding of UN troops at Nato targets by the Bosnian Serbs once again highlights the West's foreign policy fiasco in the Balkans. By failing to act decisively in the wake of the Serbian aggression in April 1992, the West has not only put the lives of the UN peace-keepers in danger, but it has also unwittingly contributed to the death of the emerging multi- ethnic Bosnian state and the fulfilment of the "Great Serbian" dream.
The Serbs began their aggression by pouring irregulars from Serbia across the Drina, the 12th-century boundary between Serbia and Bosnia, and shooting up the riverine Muslim towns. A Nato military response at this stage would have caused the Serbs to reconsider their aggression. They were not, after all, engaged in a liberation struggle, for the Bosnian Serbs had no grievance and were not being mistreated by the Bosnian Muslims. But the West used the presence of its peace-keepers in Bosnia as an excuse against the use of force, although the Serbs were in no position, either politically or strategically, to harm the UN troops.
The flexing of military muscle at this late stage may eventually help to end the war, but it is unlikely to undo the damage already inflicted on the multi-ethnic character of the Bosnian state. In erstwhile Yugoslavia, Bosnia was the epitome of ethnic tolerance and civility. As a successful multi-ethnic society, it was a challenge to the nationalist warlords of Serbia. That is why it had to be broken up. Yours faithfully,
RANDHIR SINGH BAINS
Gants Hill, Essex
27 May
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments