Letter: Wildlife conservation in Africa: on the horns of a dilemma
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Whatever Dave Currey's credentials are with respect to wildlife conservation, they do not extend to economics or to recent history (Letters, 14 April).
If sustainable utilisation increased the supply of ivory, it could hardly have 'increased ivory prices'. Elementary economics tells us that a bigger supply could only have brought prices down, discouraging poaching. Nor was the ivory ban a reaction to the failure of sustainable utilisation policies. It was a response to under-investment in elephant conservation in those countries north of Zimbabwe that did not practise sustainable utilisation.
The evidence for this is very straightforward; the only countries to show increases in elephant populations in the 1980s were those that practised sustainable utilisation: Botswana (from 20,000 to 68,000), Zimbabwe (from 47,000 to 52,000), South Africa (constant at 8,000) and Namibia (2,000 to 32,000). My colleagues and I, who were involved in the proceedings leading up to the ban, set out the facts and the economics several years ago. Mr Currey could profit from a reading of Elephants, Economics and Ivory (Edward Barbier and others), Earthscan, London, 1990.
Yours sincerely,
DAVID PEARCE
Director, Centre for
Social and Economic Research
on the Global Environment
University College London
London, WC1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments