Letter: Why we cannot know for sure that BSE-infected beef is harmful t o humans - and why that is no comfort
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Hamish McRae (22 March) argues that commercial competition can deliver public health and that governments tend to make a mess of things, as they have done in the case of BSE. The problem is that what you do not know about can harm you, and life is too short to know everything about meat production, genetic tampering, sperm-damaging chemicals and the rest of the long list of things that pose threats to health and nature. To be the text-book free-market consumer would be more than a full-time job, so I subcontract part of my consumer choice to elected representatives and their advisers. I trust them even less today than I did a week ago, but that does not mean that I want to go it alone and try to make sense of the mass of contentious scientific literature, dubious marketing claims and other judgements required to inform choice.
Clive Bates
London N16
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments