Letter: Why we benefit from single-tier local authorities - and why we don't
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Peter Newsam (letter, 22 April) claims that, in the event of unitary local government being established, the Government would withdraw education to the centre - and suggests that those who think otherwise must have been dreaming for the past 15 years. I fear that it is Sir Peter who has been asleep.
Under 15 years of Conservative rule, there has been a gradual erosion of the powers and responsibilities of local government. During that time, what precisely have the supposedly mighty and powerful county councils done to stop that erosion? Nothing] If central government wants to restrict local government's ability to act, it can do it quite well, whatever the structure.
Change the government and you might reverse that policy. Sir Peter's is a political argument, not a structural one.
Yours sincerely,
PETER RODGERS
Leader of East Hampshire District Council
Petersfield, Hampshire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments