LETTER:Why the Government paid pounds 150,000 per new 'council' house
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE claim that the use of advisers largely explains the cost of pounds 150,000 per house on the Housing Action Trust's Waltham Forest scheme is astonishing.
Even the cost quoted by Waltham Forest of pounds 50,201 a house after demolition, diversion of main services and the construction of a sound wall seems excessive. I designed council housing at Milton Keynes in the Eighties and the cost per three-bedroom house was around pounds 15,000, equivalent to about pounds 30,000 today. This included landscaping, drainage, access roads and parking.
The real explanation lies with an unnecessarily complex design and fussy details which have no justification on aesthetic grounds. Compare these pretentious terraces with the simplicity of the artisan's dwelling of the 1830s, where quality depended on little else than generous proportion in flat facades of good brickwork.
Stephen Gardiner
London SW3
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments