Letter: Why Darwin should be on a banknote
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: I was dismayed to read in your article on the design of banknotes ('Sterling work at the Bank', 2 March) that a suggestion for a portrait of Charles Darwin to appear on the reverse side of one of the denominations had been 'dumped due to the change in current thought of the value of his work'.
If there has been a change, it is that Darwin's central propositions about evolution have been immensely strengthened by the recent advance of biology, as well as by discoveries and theoretical advances earlier in this century.
Innumerable 'missing links' have been found; R. A. Fisher's integration of Mendelian genetics with natural selection (1930) showed natural selection to be immensely more powerful than one would guess intuitively; and the advance of molecular genetics set in motion by Watson and Crick's discovery of the mode of replication of the genetic material has shown the most fundamental of all life processes to be the same in all living things, and has demonstrated relationships between different groups of organisms closely in accord with the idea of common ancestry.
Darwinian evolution is questioned only by those who either are ignorant of the strength of present-day evidence in its favour, or are unwilling to admit a natural origin for the human species, or try to improve their own reputations by seeming cleverer than Darwin himself. I hope none of these factors is at work in the Bank of England.
Yours faithfully,
ANDREW HUXLEY
Trinity College
Cambridge
8 March
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments