LETTER: WHO PAYS FOR THE ARMS TRADE?
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.YOUR report neglects to mention that it is much more difficult for an investment manager to have regard to ethical issues than it is for an individual. This particularly applies to pension funds, including those of the clergy. Managers are not allowed by law to take account of ethical issues unless it can be proved that this will not prevent them from getting the best return on their clients' money.
Many people would say that ethical interests in the long term would give the best return anyway, but this is not true in the short term. Fund managers have to look at the financial position as it is at present.
The law needs to be changed so that clients are free to have their pension funds invested where these ethical issues are taken into consideration. Cancer charities are not forced to invest in tobacco companies. Neither should church or hospital pension fund managers be forced to invest in the arms trade.
Joan Hughes
London N16
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments