Letter: Whitehall's role in regional decline
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Your leading article 'England's regional identity problem' was unfortunately flawed on two counts.
The 'ancient nation state of France' was not 'long even more centralised' than England. In 973 AD when King Edgar the Peaceable was crowned first King of the English, the King of France ruled little more than the Ile de France, roughly equivalent to modern Paris, while the rest of France was ruled by proudly regional dukes and counts.
Neither are you strictly correct to assert that the oldest division of England itself is into counties. The kingdom of England was preceded by other ancient kingdoms, for example Mercia, Northumberland and Wessex, which were united by force of arms into 'England' by Arthur and his sons.
Yours,
SHEILA RAINGER
Research student
History Department
Nottingham University
Nottinghamshire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments