Letter: Where's the profit in funding film?
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: It is always encouraging to read of British success nurtured by grants ("British film-maker returns pounds 1m lottery grant as he hits jackpot at box office", 29 May) but one unanswered question is: what share of the profits is also received by the funding organisation for taking the risk?
By my calculations the British film industry, on a film cost of pounds 1.8m and a grant of pounds 980,000, should be receiving about 54 per cent of the profit. Are they? If not, then Gary Smith is right in his statement "The British film industry has always lacked financial discipline . . ."
JONATHAN YOUENS
Sidcup, Kent
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments