Letter: Where next for the Nato 'police'?
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The threatened air strikes by Nato on Serbian artillery positions in Sarajevo add yet more complexity to a world grown increasingly dangerous since the end of the Cold War. Nato is a defensive organisation. By poising it for an offensive action against the Bosnian Serbs, the West is effectively taking upon itself the role of an international policeman. However, having played such a credible role in Bosnia, it would then be impossible for the West to extricate itself from enacting a similar role in countries ravaged by internal strifes and ethnic cleansing.
At present, civil wars are being fought in many countries, including Afghanistan, Sudan, Algeria and northern Iraq. According to a recent report by the UN, more civilians are being killed by aerial bombardment and mortar fires in Kabul than in Bosnia. After having rescued the Bosnian Muslims through military action in Sarajevo, would the West undertake a similar mission in Afghanistan, where Islamic fundamentalists are engaged in a war of attrition and genocide?
The West has every right to intervene in erstwhile Yugoslavia in order to save innocent civilians from being slaughtered by the Serbian army. But why should the killings of Muslims by Christians in Bosnia be considered more sinister than the killings of Muslims by Muslims in Afghanistan?
Yours faithfully,
RANDHIR SINGH BAINS
Gants Hill, Essex
12 February
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments