Letter: When to start the new millennium bash
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Not only is Michael Dean mathematically and historically correct in asserting (letter, 29 September) that the new millennium will begin on 1 January 2001 and not 1 January 2000, he also has the backing of common usage on the last such occasion.
Anyone who has had to consult newspapers of the early 20th century - as was my task when writing the biographies of Sir Arthur Sullivan and Sir Henry J. Wood - will have noted that the new century was celebrated in January 1901, not January 1900. Apparently the nation registered a higher level of numeracy in those pre-calculator, pre-computer days.
Yours faithfully,
ARTHUR JACOBS
29 September
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments