Letter: When new windows spoil the view
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: I am writing in defence of South Somerset District Council's action in compelling a couple to remove the plastic double-glazing from their Grade II listed house at Whitelackington ('Pensioners forced to replace 'illegal' windows', 24 August).
Your photograph does not show how unlike the original these replacements are, with or without stick-on lead. They symbolise everything that is bad in modern building materials - characterless, pastiche, less durable than the material they replace, and ultimately not even bio-degradeable: in Sweden discarded UPVC windows are classified as toxic waste.
I have had dealings with the council's historic buildings officers, and found them helpful and sympathetic. They are legally bound to enforce listed-buildings regulations, and have gone beyond the call of duty with their interest-free loan to the Greens.
As I look up from writing this, I view the village through leaded lights of wavery old glass. It is a delight that should not be denied to future generations. If I want more silence or heat retention, secondary glazing panels fitted inside will not destroy the old.
Ignorance of the law is no defence: but I wholly agree with the last sentence of your leading article - the installers are party to the offence. It is not the first time that they have skated over the listed-buildings regulations in this area, in pursuit of a quick buck, and another house loses its original 'eyes' to the world.
Yours sincerely,
DAVID GORDON
Hinton St George, Somerset
24 August
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
0Comments