LETTER : When laudable goals and fine words offer simplistic solutions to complex problems

Philip Ellis
Saturday 03 June 1995 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

YOUR response to the Islington report ("PC: the right is guilty, too", 28 May) recognises one aspect of the intrusion of political correctness into local government. Another is hinted at by Margaret Hodge who, we are told in the same edition, "didn't twig" how poor some of her managers were ("We got things wrong").

This critique of local government officers and the use of external consultants have given public services a new language. Notions such as the pursuit of excellence and total quality management are difficult to resist because they combine laudable goals with apparently systematic means to achieve them.

Unfortunately, they are also products, being sold by the many management consultancies seeking new business in the public sector. I recently heard how middle managers were "dragged kicking and screaming" to an annual briefing on performance management. It is worth considering whether those managers may know more about the effective use of their time than consultants who move from one authority to another, offering simplistic solutions to complex problems.

Since 1979 central government has sought to contain public spending while avoiding the outcry that reductions or deteriorations in services provoke. Management consultants have been quick to propose ways of doing more with less. This renaissance of "scientific" management has generated an endless round of meetings and masses of documentation in search of measurement: it has distorted priorities and undermined the subtle processes through which local government has traditionally found a realistic balance between public expectations and limited resources.

The result of this form of "political correctness" is a climate in which grandiose claims cannot be challenged openly and experienced officers keep their thoughts to themselves.

Until our fledgling democracy faces up to the hard choices between ends and means "political correctness" will continue to inhibit the open exploration of what is wrong, and might be improved, in local government.

Philip Ellis

Eastbourne, E Sussex

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in