Letter: When killing is not murder
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: On Friday 25 February 1994, the killer of my son Alex was sentenced at the Old Bailey to five years in prison. I understand that he is likely to serve only 30 months and, as he has already been held in custody since April 1993, will probably be back in society in September 1995.
Alex died at the age of 23 because he was walking with a friend in a suburban high street at about 10pm on Good Friday, 9 April 1993, when he was the victim of what police have said was a violent, unprovoked attack. The killer of my son has a number of previous offences, some of which involved violence against the police.
The original charge of murder was reduced to manslaughter. I understand that this often occurs following plea bargaining, and while I can understand that a guilty plea to manslaughter results in the saving of time and money, I do not accept that justice has been done in this case.
Yours faithfully,
T. VAILL
Eastbourne
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments