Letter: What killed Dylan
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: About that Nashold/Tremlett book, which "reveals" that Dylan Thomas didn't die of drink (report, 13 October). This was discovered twenty years ago; by me. Half a grain of morphine unwisely prescribed in New York did for him. The "acute alcohol poisoning" story hasn't been taken seriously for years.
Nashold and Tremlett produce evidence that he was a diabetic. Maybe he was. Constantine FitzGibbon's biography speculated about it in 1965. What matters is the despair Thomas came to feel about his poetry and his marriage, so that in the end he put himself in the way of dying, one way or another.
PAUL FERRIS
Boughrood, Powys
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments