Letter: What if Labour dumped the PM?
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Whilst Ian Corfield is correct in his criticism of "Cassandra" (letter, 18 November) in stating that "no post-war Labour leader has ever been pushed out of office", he overlooks the difference between the current and previous mechanisms for doing so.
Under the pre-1981 system, whereby the leader was elected solely by MPs, the leader was challenged only twice after 1945. The electoral college with which it was replaced was designed so that "ordinary party members" could hold the leadership to account and remove them if necessary.
Whilst this system has been modified, and it is now far more difficult to initiate a challenge, it still has not been tested in government, and thus its democratic legitimacy has not been tested either. The question is whether it is democratic to allow a few thousand Labour Party members to decide who should be the Prime Minister.
MATTHEW SEWARD
London W2
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments