Letter: What does HIrst's udderless cow mean?
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Ms Barbara Spring
Sir: The contemporary art sceptics will have all their doubts and hates confirmed by this year's Turner Prize choice ("'Enfant Terrible' Hirst wins the spot prize", 29 November). I, too, but particularly because of a problem with the inherent nature of the work.
Anyone who has seen a cow must have a problem with Damien Hirst's cow. The poor divided creature accompanied by a calf could never have suckled any child, being to all appearances perfectly udderless: the full bag of rich and beautiful milk that gives life to calf and child, that makes a cow a cow, is simply not there.
Having given the work a name ("Mother and child divided: cow and calf") the viewer presumes the artist intends something meaningful about the work. What does this udderless cow mean? Is there a hidden agenda here: is it a cynical joke? Is it an existential exercise? Or, after the calf had been paid for, did funds not run to a real milking cow so an immature heifer was bought instead?
Once one has seen the problem one suspects a fraud; if there is not integrity in a work considered to be so important, whatever are the values of both artist and critic? I am having real trouble in suspending my disbelief, and await the explanation from the pundits hopefully, in order that understanding may awaken appreciation.
Yours sincerely,
Barbara Spring
Saltash, Cornwall
29 November
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments