Letter: What about the majority who didn't vote for Kaufman?

John Thomson
Saturday 03 October 1998 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

ALAN WATKINS ("Lord Jenkins must keep a sense of proportion", 27 September) asserts that both the Alternative Vote (AV) and Supplementary Vote (SV) systems of PR are "...usually, though not necessarily, more proportional than the present system..." This is not the case. Studies have shown that AV, had it been used at the last UK general election, would have produced an even bigger Labour majority on the same share of the overall popular vote. SV has very similar characteristics and is also unlikely to produce proportionality.

JOHN THOMSON

Charlton St Peter, Wiltshire

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in