LETTER : Welsh quango quandary
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.YOUR ARTICLE "Hague assuages green anger over Redwood" (30 July) was as wrong as your infamous "Privatising Snowdonia" stories. I proposed the transfer of some local functions like footpaths and Site of Special Scientific Interest management from a quango to elected local government in Wales. This was popular with councils and helped answer the criticism that too little was done by elected bodies. I also proposed cuts in the expensive overhead of the Countryside Council for Wales, preferring to spend money on services people wanted.
You reiterate old and wild charges from employees and former employees with most to lose from my policy. I am surprised you ignore the other argument, and forget your usual scepticism towards quango power.
John Redwood
House of Commons
London SW1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments