Letter: Welcome revival of a discrete influence

Mr Peter Davies
Sunday 13 June 1993 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Iain Gale's typically thoughtful article on the great and unfairly neglected French sculptor Germaine Richier ('Inside the bronze menagerie', 8 June) is a welcome attempt to revive a sagging reputation on the occasion of her showing in the big Paris Post-war exhibition at the Tate. Yet her influence has long been an important, if discrete, one on Britain's lively modern sculpture school. In 1980 I remember the sculptor John Wragg, having recently returned to figurative portrait modelling after an abstract period, enthusing to me about his favourite sculptor.

Indeed, Richier's menagerie of metamorphic creatures, part human and part animal or insect, inspired our own early post-war sculptors. Meadows, Butler, Frink and Chadwick shared a similar restlessness and found in their metaphors of decay, vulnerability and metamorphosis apt metaphors for the anxieties of the post-war age. Equally, her use of 'found' branches or surrogate armatures around which were built her clay legs and arms, was later echoed in the pebble breasts of Caro's waking figures.

Despite such chance effects, her art was based on life, on perceptions of real form, rather than on imagination, and in this she matched the approach of late Giacometti, the sculptor under whose shadow she has been eclipsed. Her play on transformation was underpinned by a classical French training under Bourdelle, and so expressive licence was based on broad technical ability.

Gale's emphasis on Richier's religiosity and love of life obscures her torments; several times she underwent treatment in mental hospitals.

PETER DAVIES

London, W12

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in