LETTER:Wallpaper wheeze

Dr I. R. McLauchlin
Saturday 20 January 1996 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

From Dr I. R. McLauchlin

Sir: The success of wallpaper in paste in removing old wallpaper (Letters, 13 January) does seem incredible, but there is a simple explanation.

To get paper off the wall, the old paste must be softened. You can use water to do this, but it must soak through the paper to get to the paste. Unfortunately, it runs down the wall and off the paper. Any water that does manage to wet the paper evaporates quickly. The problem reduces to one of keeping the water on the paper. Wallpaper paste itself does this, as it contains a lot of water and it sticks to the paper!

Yours faithfully,

Ian R. McLauchlin

Dursley, Gloucestershire

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in