Letter: Voting compromise for Brussels
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: As a contribution to the debate taking place in Brussels, perhaps a compromise could be reached along the following lines: the blocking vote could be raised to 27, as the 10 member states (other than Britain and Spain) wish. However, the larger countries, including the UK, Germany, France and Italy, would get an extra vote each. In Britain's case, this would then rise to 11.
That would make the system slightly more equitable in terms of the population count per vote in the Council of Ministers. The blocking vote would still be near the 30 per cent it is at present, a level that the 10 are keen to maintain. It would become slightly harder for a country such as Britain to engineer a blocking vote, but slightly easier than under the regime currently being put forward by the majority of its partners in the EU. This way, both sides would get something out of the agreement.
Yours faithfully,
SIMON NAPPER
Bracknell, Berkshire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments