Letter: Vocal opposition to Portillo over the causes of disquiet for the majority

Professor Susan Bassnett
Tuesday 26 April 1994 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: I was pleased to see that Michael Portillo has said that the Conservative Party is for the quiet majority that plays its part in the community ('Portillo speech suggests play for leadership', 23 April). I live in a village populated by the quiet majority, a small rather unremarkable village in North Warwickshire.

My youngest child has just left the village playgroup and started at the local school; another child is a Brownie; my mother is the social secretary of the W I; and I have just come back from inquiring after the health of a neighbour's dog, hit by a passing car, while my husband delivered a card to the local post-lady who has just had a baby. A very quiet majority in this village, I can assure you.

I was pleasantly surprised, too, to learn that Mr Portillo is familiar with post office queues. I confess, however, to being puzzled by his account of what people in those queues get upset about. In my village they get upset about a lot of things, but competition in schools or hand-outs to the unemployed or cruises for delinquents is rather low on the list.

Lately there have been quite a lot of topics that have exercised village opinion. Top of the list is the closure of schools all over the county. The village down the road is plastered with 'Save our School' stickers. I have just been told my Brownie will be in a class of 30 or so next year.

People without children get much more agitated about the loss of the health visitor, which, combined with the abolition of meals- on-wheels, has had devastating effects on some of the disabled older people living alone. My mother has been up in arms about meals- on-wheels. Even wrote to the MP. Her neighbour wrote, too, about the abolition of the monthly visit by the paediatrician at the village baby clinic. They have been told that there are going to be splendid new clinics in nearby towns. The problem is that nobody from the villages can get there, because the bus services have been run down or abolished.

It's all very well for Mr Portillo to tell us that he wants to see a nation of individuals ready to take on the demands of personal responsibility and build a self-confident nation. But in this village people want to know why, after so many years of supporting Conservative government, all we have to show for it is a deterioration of the transport system, huge classes in the village school, an impoverished health and welfare service and no new homes that villagers can afford to buy. It is time to ease off the back to basics rhetoric and get down to grass roots.

Yours sincerely,

SUSAN BASSNETT

Wolvey, Warwickshire

23 April

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in