Letter: Vital facts about viral illnesses

Dr Helena Savin
Wednesday 10 January 1996 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

From Dr Helena Savin and

Dr Adrian Richards

Sir: In your edition of 4 January, you have two articles referring to the treatment of viral illnesses with antibiotics. "Seles set to revive Grand Slam momentum" referred to Monica Seles being "laid low with a virus" and, later, how, following blood tests, she was put on antibiotics. A second article, "Acne drug may relieve Gulf War sickness", similarly implies that antibiotics can be effective in treating a syndrome which, according to US Senate sources, is a viral illness.

Both of these references imply that viruses can be treated by antibiotics. This is not the case. Viral illnesses do not respond to antibiotic treatment.

Much of GPs' time is taken up discussing with patients how, contrary to general public belief, a penicillin-like prescription will do nothing for their cold or flu.

This winter has seen many people suffering with a very unpleasant flu virus. Many will sit for some considerable time in surgery waiting rooms in the hope of a prescribed cure. They would certainly be better served by buying a pharmacy remedy and staying in bed.

Yours faithfully,

Helena Savin

Adrian Richards

London, SW4

6 January

From Mr Paul Brownsey

Sir: According to the Consumers' Association (In Brief: "Drugs warning", 4 January) pharmacists are failing to give enough customers enough advice when selling them over-the-counter medicines.

On the contrary, chemists in the West End of Glasgow seem bent on counselling you whether you want counselling or not. You can't even buy a packet of aspirins without being catechised by a wee assistant: "Are these for yourself?"

"Are you taking any other medication?" "Do you suffer from ...?" And so on.

Some of us do check these things out for ourselves and don't need this tedious compulsory advice. Couldn't we be given the chance to forego it?

Yours faithfully,

Paul Brownsey

Glasgow

5 January

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in