Letter: Virgin's fight over transatlantic slots
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Richard Quest says that none of the other carriers (I presume including Virgin) has devoted the same resources to London as BA-American with their 60 per cent combined market share and 80 per cent control of peak-time transatlantic slots ("Merger will not stifle competition", 12 November). What he forgets to mention is that the only reason we haven't is because we are not allowed to! Virgin would love to fly six times a day to New York and have been applying for more slots for years and years.
If the two governments allow the effective merger of these globally dominant carriers there will be even less competition across the Atlantic and Mr Quest can kiss goodbye to what service he gets today. Slots are the key and these two monopolists still insist they are not on the table.
RICHARD BRANSON
Chairman
Virgin Group of Companies
London W8
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments