Letter: Violence as a political weapon in Northern Ireland

Professor G. Carsaniga
Monday 01 November 1993 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Conor Cruise O'Brien ('Barring the road to civil war', 29 October) might have underlined yet another incoherence in the present government's attitude. It is inconsistent of the Government to declare that it cannot come to the negotiating table with Gerry Adams because that would mean yielding to IRA blackmail, yet at the same time to act on the often-stated premise that, if Britain disengaged from Northern Ireland, there would immediately be 'a huge escalation of Unionist violence against Catholics', which is, of course, yielding to Unionist blackmail.

Granted that Gerry Adams's decision to carry Thomas Begley's coffin was abhorrent to many, his relentless demonisation is just as misguided: after all, he is entitled to believe that his primary duty is not to the British public but to his power base, from which he cannot afford to isolate himself if he wishes to help in peacemaking.

Dr O'Brien seems to believe that the latest round of the 'Troubles' began with the IRA's 1971 offensive. Some would date it from the wrecking of the non-violent Civil Rights and Housing Action campaigns by Unionist activists in 1968 and 1969 (the bombing of Belfast Waterworks, the Dungannon ambush, etc) when the IRA was a spent force. The first British soldier was killed by an IRA bullet in February 1971, but the first RUC policeman to die was hit by a 'loyalist' gunman in October 1969.

So far violence seems to have profited only the Unionists, who have succeeded, over a quarter of a century, in preventing any political solution contrary to their interests.

Internment is effective only if one accepts the present Home Secretary's belief that the more people are locked up, the fewer are left outside to do mischief; but so long as the security forces allow mad dogs to boast of killing 'Fenians' by the dozen, there is no guarantee that they will lock suspects up as even-handedly as Dr O'Brien wishes. History should have taught him by now that mere repression never works and that today's terrorists are tomorrow's negotiators and leaders.

Yours faithfully,

GIOVANNI CARSANIGA

London, SW9

30 October

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in