Letter: Utility job cuts no harm to taxpayer
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: David Blunkett's accusation that taxpayers have picked up the cost of job losses in the utilities ("Utility job cuts `cost taxpayers pounds 805m' ", 14 October) is unfounded.
While it is true that in the electricity industry staffing levels have been reduced, they have been done so largely through voluntary severance and early retirement packages. Such satisfactory settlements have meant these individuals have not needed to rely on state benefits. In fact many of them are paying income tax on their pensions.
At the same time the industry contribution to the Exchequer is considerable. Since 1990 the Government has received around pounds 24bn: sale proceeds from privatisation amounted to some pounds 15bn and currently the industry pays over pounds lbn per year in corporation tax. Last year alone the industry's annual VAT payment was pounds 2.5bn.
As with any commercial business, it is not appropriate to employ more people than is necessary. One of the results of such increasing efficiency is the falling cost of electricity to all customers. Domestic prices are now 11 per cent less than six years ago, after allowing for inflation. Industrial prices under contract are as much as 16 per cent cheaper in real terms than in January 1994.
PHILIP DAUBENEY
Chief Executive
Electricity Association
London SW1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments