Letter: UN mission to Iraq
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.UN mission to Iraq
A $5.3bn oil-for-food programme to Iraq sounds impressive but would do little to alleviate suffering ("Annan offers oil-for-food deal worth billions", 20 February).
Deducted from the previous $2bn deal under UN Resolution 986 were war reparations (30 per cent), UN operations (5 to 10 per cent), costs of pipeline (5 to 10 per cent), and humanitarian aid earmarked for the Kurds of northern Iraq (15 per cent). If a similar pattern is followed this time, about $2.2bn would be available over six months. This amounts to about 58 cents' worth of food and medicine per person per day in Central and Southern Iraq.
Adequate technology and chemicals for sanitation and medical infrastructure will, of course, continue to be disallowed. One would anticipate a small reduction in the death rate, but it will continue to be of tragic proportions.
MARK WALMSLEY
Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments