Letter: UN as an instrument of Western interest

Mr Randhir Singh Bains
Monday 18 October 1993 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Your leading article 'The case for intervention' (15 October) rightly emphasises the need for new thinking on the principle of UN intervention. However, a mere change in the strategy and mechanics of intervention would not be sufficient to place the UN on a high moral ground. The UN needs to be presented as a credible international forum dedicated to the principle of peace, security and economic development.

The collapse of Communism and the end of the Cold War produced a remarkable opportunity for the world to share common values under the aegis of the UN. But the West saw the demise of international socialism as an opportunity to create a new world order; a unipolar world in which the epicentre of power would lie in Washington and three out of five permanent members of the UN Security Council would take upon themselves the roles of plaintiffs, judges and potential executioners.

The Somalian experience has demonstrated that the world is not yet ready for any kind of political realignment, and the notions of sovereignty, nation states and territorial nationalism are alive and kicking. Developing nations will always feel uneasy accepting the moral authority of the UN, especially when the UN itself gives the distinct impression of being an instrument of Western interest.

A step in the right direction might be to open up the permanent membership of the UN Security Council to some developing countries such as India, Brazil, Nigeria and Egypt.

Yours faithfully,

RANDHIR SINGH BAINS

Gants Hill, Essex

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in