Letter: UK must resist tax on art imports
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Kenneth Clarke's timetable as Chancellor is reported to begin with what is termed a 'routine meeting' of the European Community finance ministers in Brussels on 7 June. But if a proposition on the agenda is adopted, the UK will regrettably lose its freedom to import antiques and works of art without paying tax, and our national museums and private collectors will no longer be on a level playing field with their US counterparts.
It is to be hoped, therefore, that instead of accepting our Treasury's apparent solution of a low rate of tax (which is a compromise doubtless susceptible to future increases), the Chancellor will resist the overall principle of taxing these art imports and be willing to defend the issue on cultural grounds in the European Court of Justice if subsequently challenged by other member states.
Yours faithfully,
GEORGE LEVY
H. Blairman & Sons
London, W1
31 May
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments