LETTER:Twin prints
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr C. J. Coombes
Sir: A question in "technoquest" (Science, 15 August) asks: "Do identical twins have identical fingerprints?" The first part of the answer reads :
If the twins are monozygots (from the same egg), they will have identical fingerprints.
This is incorrect.
Careful scientific research has proved that the arrangement of the papillary ridges on an individual finger or thumb is not repeated on any other finger, whether of the same or other person, irrespective of relationship. While it is true that a certain correlation of patterns often exists in the prints of twins, there the likeness ends. Identification by means of fingerprints does not depend on pattern-type similarity but on the coincident sequence of the papillary ridge characteristics. That is where the uniqueness of each individual person is displayed.
The second part of the answer provides a misleading statement regarding identity:
Environmental factors and changes after birth, however, are likely to change them later.
Yes, pathological creases will occur and scars may sometimes be formed through injury, but they play no part in the method of making an identification. Mr Puri, from India, states in a paper on monovular twins, dated 1968:
It is a medically admitted fact that the ridges on fingers are formed in the fourth (foetal) month and, whatever pattern and ridge details they assume, only grow in the later months and do not undergo any change.
The simple fact is that fingerprints are formed before birth and persist unaltered throughout life, each being unique to not only the individual but to the digit.
Yours faithfully,
Christopher J. Coombes
Director of Identification Services
S03 Branch
New Scotland Yard
London, SW1
17 August
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments