Letter: Tube needs cash, not a shake-up

John Stewart
Friday 28 February 1997 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: I am surprised at your leading article (26 February) arguing that privatisation may be the way forward for London Underground.

London Underground is not simply a metropolitan version of the old British Rail, weighed down by outdated practices and unimaginative management. It already has in place the flexible work patterns that the newly privatised rail companies are introducing. For some years now its management has been making a cogent case for the expansion of the Underground.

We must not allow the congested rush-hour conditions - which is all many people experience - to blind us to the fact that the Underground provides Londoners with a solid service from the early morning until well past midnight: the trains are frequent, fast, and usually reliable.

The spectacular structural failings that take place from time to time have nothing to do with management or staff attitudes: they are simply a legacy of years of under-investment.

The way forward is not to get bogged down in the disruptive process of privatisation, but for the next government to ensure that London Underground is able to get sufficient money, from both public and private sources, to enable it to run a modern metro which can play an important role in cutting the congestion on the capital's roads.

JOHN STEWART

Chair, Alarm UK

London E3

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in