Letter: Trouble at Radio 3
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Somebody had better say it: Nicholas Kenyon's attempts to modernise Radio 3 are a disaster. We have presenters of music programmes-cum-chat shows attempting to read the news, and interviews of a mind-boggling banality. Last week Richard Baker played host to someone who spoke about 'simplicticality'; the normally admirable Michael Berkeley told us it was now his 'duty and privilege' to read the headlines; and to listen to another distinguished musicologist, Edward Greenfield, struggling with his script like a conscript up to his knees in mud is simply embarrassing.
Does Mr Kenyon not realise that people like myself used to listen to Radio 3 first thing in the morning, and again first thing in the evening, precisely because we did not want to be talked to all the time or be bored to death with repetitive news bulletins every 13 minutes? If we did, we could easily switch to Radio 4, where these things are done professionally.
The reason listening figures for Radio 3 are minute is because the channel has always aimed at excellence. How many new listeners lured by popularity does Mr Kenyon plan to capture at how great a sacrifice of the very highest standards? If my attitude to what has been achieved so far - the destruction of something that used to make life more tolerable - makes me an elitist, then I am proud to be called one.
There is no way in which you can make the finest broadcasting service in the world 'popular', because the attempt produces a contradiction in terms. Those who want lower standards of content and presentation are already all too adequately catered for.
Yours faithfully,
MICHAEL DE-LA-NOY
Hove, East Sussex
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments