Letter: Too shocking

Philip Kedge
Saturday 08 May 1999 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

IF YOUR front-page picture of a mutilated body following the Nato attack on the bridge near Luzane was designed to shock then it succeeded (2 May). However, to shock in this instance serves no useful purpose as most intelligent people can reasonably imagine the horrors following a direct hit to civilians of a cruise missile attack. If the purpose was to sell your papers then it was an act of gross insensitivity.

To what lengths would you go? Would you have freely published a picture of a mutilated body following the recent London bomb? Do not pander to the voyeuristic nature of the masses.

PHILIP KEDGE

Nr Farnham, Surrey

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in