Letter: Tony Blair's ideology has little to do with the Labour Party
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr David Rendel, MP
Sir: Your substantial coverage of Tony Blair's proposal to impose a system of all-powerful mayors on local government highlights the hypocritical nature of Labour's current approach to local democracy. Far from putting "voters back in the driving seat of local government" (leading article; "Someone worth calling mayor", 12 December), Mr Blair's proposal may simply make it easier for central government to strengthen its hold over local authorities.
It was after all Mr Blair who, only weeks earlier, drummed the leader of Walsall council, David Church, out of the Labour Party.
Under the Blair plan, many more local authorities would be dominated by a highly personalised leadership. Yet Mr Blair has made it clear that he will only allow such leadership to remain in place if it conforms strictly to national Labour Party policy.
It is hard to believe that the policy represents any new philosophical commitment to local democracy. Ultimately, Labour must face up to the fact that local democracy is not meant to offer maximum convenience to prime ministers - or to leaders of the opposition.
It is intended to offer local people an effective means of governing their own affairs in a way that is truly accessible and accountable. This is a simple point, but it does not fit with Mr Blair's vision of a presidential Britain where he and his elite band of disciples pull all the strings of power.
Yours sincerely,
David Rendel
MP for Newbury (Lib Dem)
House of Commons
London, SW1
12 December
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments