Letter: Tomlinson's effect on casualties, mental health and community care
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: I have been saddened by the knee-jerk reactions of people to the Tomlinson report. I am a GP in south-east London and know that health care in London cannot carry on the way that it has been with long waiting lists and, until this report, very little concern for the needs of local populations.
The focus of care must be the services provided and not the historical buildings it has been delivered from. These buildings, full of empty beds, are costing Londoners huge amounts of money and this will continue to limit the services they receive unless some closures and integration occur, as set out in the report.
This report has not been produced by a right-wing think tank, but largely by the King's Fund. It has tried to set out a better way to provide health care in the capital by building up primary care, which has never developed easily in the shadow of established teaching hospitals. This can only be done by putting money into primary care before closing secondary care units, and fighting to ensure that it is properly resourced. It is not a way for the Government to save money.
Many GPs in London need help to develop. This is a golden opportunity to focus care at a community level, not leave it based on the very large secondary care units. Patients should be treated as members of their communities who are temporarily 'lent' to hospitals for such care as and when the need arises. Responsibility for this should rest with primary care.
It is ironic that such strong supporters of communities as the miners should be linked to opposition to a report that wishes to put more care back into the community. Please allow my colleagues and I the chance to develop a better model for health care in London.
Yours faithfully,
MARC ROWLAND
London, SE23
25 October
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments