LETTER: Those who wish to rewrite history start by banning books

Julian Foster
Saturday 08 July 1995 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

PETER TATCHELL argues that the publishers of William L Shirer's The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich should withdraw the book until it is amended to include references to the Nazi persecution of homosexuals ("No place in history for gay victims of Nazism", 2 July).

As Mr Tatchell himself notes, a not insignificant part of that persecution was the burning of books "stolen from the trashed headquarters of the homosexual movement, the Institute for Sexual Science".

Is the pulping of books, then, a more acceptable method of denying people's access to written materials than burning them? And did not Hitler's minister for propaganda superintend the withdrawal of the Bible so that it could be rewritten to reflect the Nazi creed? A more constructive approach might be for Mr Tatchell to write his own magnum opus on Nazi persecutions, giving interested parties the opportunity to draw on a wider selection of work than exists at present and reach their own conclusions. This would be to promote a freedom that Mr Tatchell impliedly advocates in his article - that of choice.

Julien Foster

Bromley, Kent

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in