Letter: Those meaningful - and elusive - questions about the existence of God
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Your cartoon of 2 August showing God receiving treatment on the psychiatrist's couch, and Bryan Appleyard's article 'Give us faith, in something' (3 August) require a response.
It is logically possible that the current Sea of Faith school is asking the wrong questions about God and human existence. The question 'Does God really exist?' is meaningful both within and without the confines of specific religious discourse.
It is immaterial that one cannot prove that God does really exist since no one can claim to have discovered finally or absolutely what really does exist, as philosophers and scientists adopt different criteria for the use of the word 'real'. Questions such as 'do physical objects really exist?'; 'what is the criterion of moral obligation?'; are just as elusive to a final affirmative answer as 'does God really exist?'.
Traditionalists need not apologise for their belief in the God who enters our human nature and redeems it. God is not on the way out, as Appleyard suggests. Wittgenstein, in typical concise style, said: 'The limits of my language mean the limits of my world.'
Don Cupitt's Sea of Faith disciples need to extend themselves further. What they leave us with is, in the poet's word (R. S. Thomas 'Synopsis'): 'The beast that rages through history; that presides smiling at the councils of the positivists.' I prefer God is in Christ reconciling the world to Himself.
Yours sincerely,
ERIC LINDSAY
Saint Fillan's Rectory
Kilmacolm,
Strathclyde
3 August
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments