Letter: Third World debt
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Andreas Whittam Smith (Comment, 19 May) is wrong: there is no paradox at all in the concept of lender's responsibility. My father, a retired banker, describes what was dinned into him as the "canon of good lending": that lending is a proposition based on the borrower being able to repay and having a sufficiently good reason for taking out the loan in the first place. Any lending which runs the risk of becoming an unrepayable debt or ruining the borrower is bad lending.
That the Third World borrowers have on occasions been corrupt or naive is not open to question. But the real paradox is this: the poor saw little or no benefit from the loans, and are now being expected to bear the brunt of the suffering.
JAMES M B McLAREN
Cheltenham, Gloucestershire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments