LETTER: There's no magic in the lottery
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr Hugh Shanahan
Sir: Clifford German's assumption (Section Two; "Lottery slaves and hot numbers", 31 January) that numbers that have not turned up very often in previous draws will have a greater chance of appearing in the next draw is wrong.
An individual draw cannot be affected by previous (or indeed future) draws. One can say something about the frequency of numbers from a very large number of draws (and, indeed, I suspect that that number would have to be much bigger than what we have right now), but just because 39 has only appeared twice does not mean that it will magically be persuaded to go down that pipe next Saturday. Furthermore, describing the sequence 1,2,3,4,5,6 as "unlikely" is a half-truth, because every other possible combination is equally unlikely.
Yours sincerely,
Hugh Shanahan
Glasgow
3 February
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments