Letter: There is no point in banning fertiliser
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Sidney Alford is right (Letters, 3 May) when he says that ammonium nitrate fertiliser remains banned in Ireland, even though the IRA uses the 'dilute' form, calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) in the bombs it manufactures.
What Mr Alford does not say is that it is also possible to manufacture bombs from the only other high-nitrogen fertiliser available in the world: urea. The US press claims that urea was used in the recent World Trade Center bomb in New York. It is reported that the London bombs were manufactured from CAN and then brought over from Ireland.
We are therefore faced with the unhappy fact that all the main nitrogen fertilisers - the use of which has allowed food production to keep pace with increasing world population - can be used as components for bombs. Attempts over many years to alter their chemical composition to prevent this have failed.
Greater use should be made of recycled organic nutrient sources, but the world's population cannot survive without use of fertiliser, made from nitrogen extracted from the air, which speeds the natural nitrogen cycle. To ban them in the UK would not prevent terrorists getting hold of them. The only way forward is for us all to be as alert and security-minded as possible so as not to make life easy for evil people.
Yours faithfully,
B. HIGGS
Director General
Fertiliser Manufacturers
Association
Peterborough
4 May
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments