Letter: The USSR then and Russia now
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Your interesting leading article of 24 February ('Echoes of old Russia resound') does not bring out one important distinction between Russia's present international stance and that of the defunct Soviet Union.
The USSR had universalist pretensions, claiming to be the patron of the working class throughout the world. Though this claim was not universally accepted, it had enough validity to ensure the support of more or less active fifth columns in many if not most of the countries of the world. Russia has no such pretensions, and so no ready-made fifth columns at its disposal; not many countries, and not many political parties now look to Moscow for guidance and support (Serbia is of course a special case).
Russia today is in the same position internationally as Russia before the Bolshevik revolution, a Great Power like another (perhaps not quite so powerful as it looks), likely to play its part, probably a little too loudly, in the Concert of Europe. If this is to depend, as your leading article suggests, on 'a complete transition to liberal democracy', we may have a long time to wait; liberal democracy has only existed in Russia for a few short months in 1917, and did not make much of a showing then.
Yours faithfully,
WILLIAM HAYTER
Oxford
25 February
The writer was Ambassador to the USSR (1953-57).
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments