Letter: The undermining effect of buying health-care
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: I was somewhat baffled by the suggestion by David Tod, the president of the National Association of Fundholders, that the ability of fundholders to buy private-sector care is of benefit to the NHS ('When the practitioner becomes the purchaser', 15 July). Given that such purchasing undermines the spread of work and the contracts available to NHS community and hospital units, it has exactly the opposite impact.
Rather than absorbing the variety of costs which arise in any provider unit, the private sector is able to pick off the easy, high-turnover, minor procedures, while the NHS is expected to cope with expensive, high-technology, longer-stay treatments. Contrary to what Dr Tod implies, unit costs for the latter forms of treatment are therefore pushed up, endangering their viability and the scope and quality of services available to NHS patients.
This is a nonsensical state of affairs in which the obsession with competition, rather than caring for the sick, becomes the rationale behind the purchasing of health services. It also demonstrates again that simply allowing ever more GPs to adopt fundholding status is not the panacea for the problems created by fundholding in the first place.
Yours sincerely,
DAVID BLUNKETT
MP for Sheffield Brightside (Lab)
House of Commons
London, SW1
The writer is shadow Secretary of State for Health.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments